What will we ban next?

Now that Philly has followed in the steps of New York City and passed a smoking ban, could this be far behind?

NYC mulls ban on trans fats in eateries

2 Comments so far

  1. salas (unregistered) on September 28th, 2006 @ 6:56 pm

    The two biggest reasons why the smoking ban makes sense are: 1) Non-smokers are impacted, and 2) Smoking is toxic and addictive.

    As far as I know, I’m not going to get sick if someone near me is eating fatty foods and I’m not going to become addicted to trans-fats.

    That trans-fats can be easily replaced with healthier alternatives, with the consumer not noticing, goes to the point that trans-fats are not addictive.


  2. Jay V Cruz (unregistered) on September 29th, 2006 @ 10:39 am

    THEY’RE GONNA STOP US FROM EATING DELICIOUS FOODS?!?!?!?!?!??!???!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!??!??!?!!?!



Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.