What will we ban next?

By phi_marisa
September 28th, 2006 @ 3:08 PM Food

Now that Philly has followed in the steps of New York City and passed a smoking ban, could this be far behind?

NYC mulls ban on trans fats in eateries

Related posts:

  1. Au revoir, trans fats.
  2. Trans fat ban for Philly?
  3. Two Lungs Up
  4. Light Up Somewhere Else!
  5. Cafeteria of Shame

2 Comments so far

  1. salas (unregistered) September 28th, 2006 6:56 pm

    The two biggest reasons why the smoking ban makes sense are: 1) Non-smokers are impacted, and 2) Smoking is toxic and addictive.

    As far as I know, I’m not going to get sick if someone near me is eating fatty foods and I’m not going to become addicted to trans-fats.

    That trans-fats can be easily replaced with healthier alternatives, with the consumer not noticing, goes to the point that trans-fats are not addictive.

  2. Jay V Cruz (unregistered) September 29th, 2006 10:39 am

    THEY’RE GONNA STOP US FROM EATING DELICIOUS FOODS?!?!?!?!?!??!???!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!??!??!?!!?!


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.